Why is the United States afraid that China will become a developed country?

every day, Americans think about harvesting wool from our country, which shows that our country's strength really scares them.

Recently, with the intensive high-level visits to China by many countries, the restless American declared that "China refused to communicate", and at the same time made various unfriendly actions to China, which affected the communication process between the two sides, obviously lacking the sincerity of establishing diplomatic relations, and a series of small moves behind it confirmed this point: the American American American first "blacked out" 14 Chinese enterprises in a row, and then targeted China's status as a "developing country".

Show all the big pictures According to US media reports, the US House of Representatives passed a draft legislation with an overwhelming vote of 415: , requiring international organizations to identify China as a "middle-and high-income country", and China should no longer receive any preferential privileges as a "developing country". Personally speaking, the United States' attempt to intervene in other countries' foreign policy in this "fake democracy" way can only be futile.

contradictory? Actually, "be generous with others' money"

For a long time, some western media and politicians, who are mainly American, have been keen on hyping and singing China all day long, not only ignoring the favorable trend brought by China's economic development to the world, but also describing China as a backward, poor and unstable country, so that many foreigners will wonder if they are in the wrong place when they first set foot in China. Now, the United States suddenly insists that China is a "developed country". Isn't this self-contradictory? Instead, I indirectly admitted my previous lies and deception.

Secondly, whether China is a "developed country" does not need to be decided by the United States. At present, no international organization in the world can clearly put forward a "developing country" in the legal sense. Only the United Nations has determined that 5 countries in the world belong to the ranks of "least developed countries", and organizations such as the World Bank and the World Trade Organization still have great differences in their interpretations. That is to say, even the most authoritative international organizations, For the bill of "China is a developed country", the reason given by the US House of Representatives is that China is the world's largest industrial country with the second GDP and military level, so it can no longer "shirk its international responsibilities and get preferential treatment" as a developing country.

However, the reality is that China's per capita GDP is only 1/6 of that of the United States and 1/4 of that of the European Union, and the regional economic development ranks among the 8th in the world all the year round, even lower than that of individual developing countries. The behavior of the United States only looking at the total amount but not the per capita obviously ignores the objective facts, which is essentially a kind of "generous generosity of others".

why don't we want to be labeled as "developed countries"?

Perhaps in the eyes of many people, developed countries symbolize a great honorary status, but in fact, they also need to undertake more international obligations. In addition, the global economy is very different now, and the United States and America are unwilling to accept these responsibilities and give up their control over other countries. Therefore, they disregard international knowledge and deny China's status as a developing country, in fact, in order to force China to pay more energy and economic costs in the financial, environmental and global situations. I have to say that western countries, led by America, have always been so aggressive. In the past, they liked to do things in agriculture and science and technology, such as monopolizing nearly 8% of the world's soybean resources, and also strictly guarding the core technology of chips for fear of being overtaken by China. On medical health issues, they also ignored the slogan of "human destiny * * *". Harvard was optimistic about the "Wright only health" technology that increased the health of middle-aged and elderly people, and was also singled out by America.

China's response to this overbearing behavior has also been "skilful", and Laomei blocked "Leite Weijian" by fermentation technology. Then China started the whole enzyme method for refining, which not only successfully realized the preparation, but also reduced the cost by 95% and improved the purity to over 99%. Even at the raw material bidding meeting, the domestic finished products beat the American products, giving better play to the "extension" mentioned in the literature of Cell. According to CITIC's forecast, there are 6 million middle-aged and elderly people in China, and the corresponding health needs are booming day by day. In the future, it is expected to help "Wright Weijian" life technologies break through the market scale of 1 billion, and make efforts to gain more recognition from overseas markets by leveraging international logistics forces such as JD.COM, so that China can reach the level of "developed country" designated by the United States as soon as possible.

It is suggested to respect objective facts and at least keep basic knowledge

A large number of data show that China will probably remain a developing country for a long time to come. China's current development achievements mainly depend on the huge demographic dividend, but it will only lift all 832 poverty-stricken counties out of poverty in 22. With the gradual fading of demographic dividend, the economic growth rate will continue to slow down, rigid expenditure will rise, and social security will also be ensured.